Harry Enfield says he 'doesn't regret' blackface sketch
A teenage student, suspended from his school after wearing makeup that was deemed to be blackface, has received the backing of his parents – who claim it wasn’t racist, but in fact just war paint.
The eighth grader, known only as J.A. for privacy reasons, was attending a football match between La Jolla High School and Morse High School in California last month.
According to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), the youngster wore dark face paint on his cheeks and chin as a way of supporting his team.
The kid’s infuriated father said that prior to the backlash his son had “a fun, great night without any trouble”.
The father even claimed to Cal Coast News that a black security guard present at the match had encouraged him to wear more makeup.
But elsewhere a storm was brewing.
Barely a week later, the boy and his parents were hauled into the Muirlands Middle School in La Joila by its principal Jeff Luna.
Following the meeting, the parents were told the child had been suspended for two days, and banned from all future athletic events.
Don’t miss…
RuPaul’s Drag Race star speaks out after ‘blackface’ controversy[LATEST]
Saturday Night Takeaway’s biggest controversies from blackface to voting scandal[INSIGHT]
Conor McGregor’s mum denies she wore blackface after Halloween snaps[ANALYSIS]
A note from the meeting said J.A. “painted his face black at a football game”, an action that was deemed by Luna and the school as an “offensive comment, intent to harm”.
Luna also claimed the face paint was offensive to the school, which has a “largely Black” student base.
FIRE took on the family complaint, filing a note to the principal that detailed how the child’s First Amendment right had been violated and demanding a reversal of its decision.
It said: “As the First Amendment protects J.A.’s non-disruptive expression of team spirit via a style commonly used by athletes and fans – notwithstanding your inaccurate description of it as ‘blackface’ – FIRE calls on the school to remove the infraction from J.A.’s disciplinary record and lift the ban on his attendance at future athletic events.”
- Support fearless journalism
- Read The Daily Express online, advert free
- Get super-fast page loading
Aaron Terr, FIRE’s director of public advocacy, said the child’s “appearance emulated the style of eye black worn by many athletes,” adding that “such use of eye black began as a way to reduce glare during games, but long ago evolved into ‘miniature billboards for personal messages and war-paint slatherings’”.
He also noted that J.A. wore the face paint “throughout the game without incident”.
He concluded: “In the seminal student speech case Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court held the First Amendment protected public school students’ right to wear black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War,” he said.
“The Court made clear school officials cannot restrict student speech based on speculative ‘undifferentiated fear’ that it will cause disruption or feelings or unpleasantness or discomfort among the student body.
“Rather Tinker requires evidence that the speech has or will ‘materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school.’
“There is no evidence J.A.’s face paint caused a disruption – let alone a material and substantial one – at the football game or at school afterward.”
After it emerged the school would not overturn its decision, FIRE sent the case on to the San Diego Unified School District on Monday.
Source: Read Full Article
