Oprah Winfrey's company sues over Oprahdemics podcast

Oprah Winfrey’s company Harpo Inc sues over Oprahdemics podcast that discuss the cultural impact of the ‘Queen of Talk’

  • Suit was filed in Manhattan Federal Court on Tuesday 
  • Winfrey’s Harpo Inc said it is neither seeking profits or damages from Oprahdemics creators 
  • It is requesting a name change saying that podcast/events dilute Oprah and O trademarks 
  • Oprahdemics co-producer said of suit: ‘We hope to resolve it’ 

Oprah Winfrey’s company Harpo Inc. has filed a lawsuit against the creators of the Oprahdemics podcast, claiming that the program misleads listeners into thinking she sponsored or approved it.

In a complaint filed late Tuesday in Manhattan Federal Court, Winfrey’s Harpo Inc said it is neither seeking profits or damages from Oprahdemics creators Kellie Carter Jackson and Leah Wright Rigueur, nor trying to stop the podcast.

Instead, it wants a name change, saying the podcast and related live events dilute Harpo’s Oprah and O trademarks, and wrongly capitalize on the goodwill that Winfrey has spent decades building.

The latest: Oprah Winfrey’s company has filed a lawsuit against the creators of the Oprahdemics podcast, claiming that the program misleads listeners into thinking she sponsored or approved it. Winfrey, 68, was pictured in 2019 in NYC 

Harpo, which is Oprah spelled backward, said simply being associated with the Oprah brand often causes an ‘exponential’ jump in sales, known as ‘The Oprah Effect’ or ‘The O Factor.’

The Oprahdemics website describes Jackson and Rigueur as historians and friends who break down iconic episodes of Winfrey’s talk show and discuss the cultural impact of the ‘Queen of Talk.’

Oprahdemics was launched by Roulette Productions this past March, and concluded its initial season at June’s Tribeca Film Festival.

In a statement, co-producer Jody Avirgan, whose company Roulette Productions is also a defendant, called Oprahdemics a ‘journalistic exploration by history professors and sincere, longtime fans of Oprah Winfrey.’

Winfrey was pictured at her father’s funeral in Nashville last month 

In the suit, Winfrey’s company is requesting a name change, saying the podcast and related live events dilute Harpo’s Oprah and O trademarks, and wrongly capitalize on the goodwill that Winfrey has spent decades building. She was pictured in 2020

Avirgan continued: ‘As independent producers, we feel it’s important to have fun, approachable, and educational conversations about the cultural impact of Ms. Winfrey. This comes from a place of both deep admiration and critical thinking. Kellie and Leah are remarkable hosts.’

Avirgan said Roulette ‘has been engaged with the team at Harpo for some time – while genuinely surprised by this, we hope to resolve it.’

In an April interview with NPR, Rigueur called Winfrey an institution.

‘This is a woman, a Black woman, who has dominated multiple spaces and arenas’ since the 1980s, she said. ‘I say that in a way that doesn’t absolve her of … constructive criticism or feedback or anything like that, but instead as recognition of … the institution of Oprah Winfrey and the Oprah Winfrey brand.’

Winfrey, 68, is also an actress and philanthropist who parlayed her namesake Chicago television talk show, which ran nationally from 1986 to 2011, into a media and business empire. She is worth $2.5 billion, according to Forbes magazine.

The case is Harpo Inc v Jackson et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-06787. 

Source: Read Full Article